Simulations & decision preparation

Put your strategies to the test.

Whaydon designs and runs strategic simulations for armed forces, industrial companies and their partners. The aim: test your assumptions before reality does it for you.

Prepare a pilot exercise

The problem

A plan is never played alone.

A production ramp-up depends on a supplier, a funder, a prime contractor. Each has its own constraints and interests, rarely visible in the plan.

Organisations often discover their dependencies when these turn into a crisis. A simulation brings them out beforehand, at limited cost, in a setting where mistakes are allowed.

How we work

Test, confront, replay.

  1. 01

    Test internally

    Your team plays on its own first: assumptions, reflexes and dependencies become visible before they meet other actors.

  2. 02

    Confront the actors

    The roles of your partners are played by participants or by simulated actors, flagged as such, to explore their constraints and commitments.

  3. 03

    Replay and adjust

    The debrief explains the consequences of choices; the replay lets you compare options and prepare what follows.

Deliverables

What you get.

  • A scenario built around your challenge and its actors
  • One or several facilitated sessions, with replay
  • A written debrief: assumptions tested, points of dependency, options compared
  • Next steps: trade-offs to prepare, discussions to open with partners

Example

When a supplier’s lead time changes.

A prime contractor, an industrial company, a supplier and a funder. The supplier revises its lead time. A commitment moves from “to be confirmed” to “to be renegotiated”. The team compares two options, with no performance figures: adapt the schedule or diversify supply.

Illustration of method, fictional data.

Illustration of method — fictional scene, fictional data.When other people’s decisions change your plan.Illustration of a strategic exercise between industrial and defence actors, followed by a representation of the assumptions, commitments and adjustments discussed.
Transcript
  1. 0–5 s Illustration: a working session brings industry and defence professionals around a table.
  2. 5–12 s Four actors: prime contractor, industrial company, supplier, funder, and their commitments. One disruption appears: supplier lead time revised.
  3. 12–17 s A commitment moves from “to be confirmed” to “to be renegotiated”. Two qualitative options are compared: adapt the schedule or diversify supply.
  4. 17–20 s Whaydon. Test. Confront. Adjust.

The examples (production ramp-up, support and maintenance, failure of a critical supplier, coordination between prime contractor, SMEs and funders) are illustrative. A simulation sheds light on choices; it does not predict real behaviour.